Practice Areas:
"PRE-CHARGE" CASES
RELEASE HEARINGS
ASSAULT
CHILD ABUSE / SBS
COMPUTER CRIMES
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
DRUG CASES
DUI / DWI LAWS
DUI DEFENSES
MVD HEARINGS
JUVENILE CASES
PROBATION REVOCATION
PROF. LICENSING
SEX CRIMES
THEFT / WHITE COLLAR
ASSET FORFEITURE
VEHICULAR CRIMES
WARRANTS / EXTRADITION
SENTENCE MODIFICATION
APPEALS / RULE 32
|
CRIMINAL CASES IN ARIZONA
If you have been arrested or accused of a crime or serious traffic offense,
you need an experienced criminal defense attorney who is able to honestly
answer your questions and zealously protect your individual and constitutional
rights. The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has significant experience
and expertise in successfully defending clients in criminal cases in
state and federal courts throughout Arizona.
Any person facing the possibility of being convicted of a crime, being
sent to jail or prison, or being placed on probation, should always hire
an experienced criminal defense attorney. The complexity of the criminal
justice system, coupled with the emotional, social, and professional impact
of a conviction requires professional representation. Each criminal case
is unique, and only an attorney who is experienced in dealing with the many
variables present in any given prosecution, can provide meaningful representation
for those charged with a criminal offense. This is so even in the cases
where a conviction seems a certainty. Often, there are creative alternatives
to the prosecution itself and in sentencing.
We represent clients in all types of criminal and traffic cases, from
minor infractions and misdemeanors, to the most serious felonies. Our criminal
practice includes legal advice and representation in the following areas:
|
General Offenses
|
|
DUI/Traffic |
|
Aggravated Assault
|
|
Aggravated Driving
|
|
Arson
|
|
Aggravated DUI
|
|
Assault
|
|
Drag Racing
|
|
Bribery
|
|
Driving on a Suspended License
|
|
Burglary
|
|
Endangerment
|
|
Child Abuse or Neglect
|
|
Extreme DUI
|
|
Criminal Trespass
|
|
Misdemeanor DUI and DWI
|
|
Criminal Damage
|
|
Motor Vehicle Hearings
|
|
Domestic Violence
|
|
Reckless Driving
|
|
Embezzlement
|
|
|
|
False Statements
|
|
Sex Offenses
|
|
Forgery
|
|
Computer Crimes
|
|
Injunction Against Harassment Violations
|
|
Failure to Register as a Sex Offender
|
|
Issuing Bad Checks
|
|
Molestation of a Child
|
|
Kidnapping
|
|
Public Sexual Indecency
|
|
Manslaughter
|
|
Sex Abuse
|
|
Misconduct with Weapons
|
|
Sex Assault
|
|
Murder
|
|
Sexual Misconduct with a Minor
|
|
Negligent Homicide
|
|
|
|
Order of Protection Violations
|
|
White Collar Crimes
|
|
Pandering
|
|
Environmental Crimes
|
|
Perjury
|
|
Extortion
|
|
Resisting Arrest
|
|
Fraudulent Schemes
|
|
Robbery
|
|
Money Laundering
|
|
Shoplifting
|
|
Professional Licensing Issues
|
|
Stalking
|
|
Racketeering
|
|
Theft
|
|
Regulatory Crimes
|
|
Unlawful Imprisonment
|
|
|
| |
|
Post-Conviction Remedies
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
Appeals
|
|
Custodial Interference
|
|
Rule 32 Post Conviction Remedies
|
|
Extradition Cases
|
|
Setting Aside Convictions
|
|
Forfeiture Cases
|
|
Restoration of Rights
|
|
Juvenile Court Cases
|
|
Restitution Cases
|
|
Probation Violations
|
|
Motion for New Trial
|
Please note this list is not exhaustive. Regardless of the charge, we can assure
you that your driving privileges, your liberty, and your welfare are best placed
with us when legal problems present themselves. If you have been charged with
any type of criminal or traffic offense, you need quality representation. The
Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has successfully defended through settlement,
bench, and jury trials well over one thousand such cases. We help our clients
successfully negotiate the criminal justice system and provide outstanding representation
in all aspects of criminal law.
An experienced and knowledgeable criminal defense attorney can:
|
•
|
negotiate plea "deals" with prosecutors, often arranging for
dismissal, diversions, reduced charges, and lesser sentencing;
|
|
|
|
•
|
help
clients cope with their emotions and feelings of embarrassment,
uncertainty, anxiety, and fear that a criminal investigation
or charges tend to produce in many individuals;
|
|
|
|
•
|
provide
clients with an objective perspective on their situation and
what is likely to happen should their case proceed to trial.
This perspective is vital for defendants trying to decide whether
or not to accept a prosecutor's offered "plea agreement;"
|
|
|
|
•
|
apply
the applicable law, legal precedent, and rules that people representing
themselves or inexperienced attorneys may find difficult to locate
on their own. Many criminal law precedents are set forth in court
interpretations of federal and state constitutions. For example,
understanding and challenging what may
constitute “reasonable suspicion” to stop a vehicle or "probable
cause for arrest” requires familiarity with particular legal issues as
set forth in state and federal appellate court opinions, statutory law, and rules
of procedure;
|
|
|
|
•
|
help
you navigate the judicial system through years of practical experience.
A seasoned criminal practitioner will be familiar with local
court customs and procedures that are not written down anywhere.
For example, a knowledgeable and experienced defense attorney
may know which prosecutor or supervisor has the authority to
help settle a case; what kinds of arguments are likely to appeal
to a particular prosecutor, and what a certain judge may be inclined
to do based upon past experience;
|
|
|
|
•
|
understand
the possible "hidden costs" of pleading guilty;
|
|
|
|
•
|
gather
information from prosecution witnesses, who often fear people
accused of crimes and are, therefore, reluctant to speak to people
representing themselves;
|
|
|
|
•
|
hire
and manage investigators, expert witnesses, psychologists and
other "defense team" members; and
|
|
|
|
•
|
formulate
sentencing programs tailored to a client's particular needs,
often helping defendants address a specific problem and/or avoid
a prison or jail sentence;
|
BENCH WARRANTS
When a defendant fails to appear for a scheduled court date, the judge will order
a bench warrant for the defendant's arrest. The warrant is a court order authorizing
a person's arrest. If a defendant is apprehended outside of Arizona on an outstanding
Arizona felony warrant, Arizona may seek the defendant's extradition back to
Arizona. The decision to extradite depends in large part on the nature of the
charges. If a defendant is apprehended in Arizona on an outstanding Arizona warrant,
the defendant is not usually eligible for release until the defendant is taken
before the court that issued the warrant.
When a bench warrant is issued and the defendant has an insufficient explanation
for failing to appear, there can be serious consequences. These may include the
defendant being further prosecuted for failing to appear as required by law,
the court granting default judgment(s) against the defendant on civil traffic
tickets, the defendant being held in civil contempt of court, the defendant's
driver's license being suspended, and the defendant's bond being forfeited. Failing
to appear on a felony charge can be charged as a separate felony offense. Failing
to appear on a misdemeanor can be charged as a separate misdemeanor offense.
A criminal defense attorney can assist an out-of-custody defendant who has an
outstanding bench warrant by:
|
1.
|
having
the defendant prepare to post-adequate bond; |
|
2.
|
asking
the state to agree to reasonable conditions of release; |
|
3.
|
filing
a motion requesting the court quash the warrant;
|
|
4.
|
arranging
a date where the defendant can self-surrender before the judge
that issued the bench warrant; and
|
|
5.
|
appearing
in court with the defendant to assist the court in setting conditions
of release.
|
Back
to Top of Page
EXTRADITION
International
Extradition refers to the formal process by which an individual is delivered
from the country where he is located to the requesting or demanding country in
order to face prosecution, or if already convicted, to serve a sentence.
Extradition is usually carried out pursuant to a treaty between two countries
(bilateral treaty) or between multiple countries (multilateral convention). The
United States currently has extradition treaties in force with over 100 countries.
Extradition to the demanding country is subject to the laws, procedures and policies
of the asylum or requested country (the country the defendant is to be delivered
from). If the individual is extradited to the requesting country, the manner
in which he is prosecuted or sentenced in the requesting country may be positively
influenced by having a competent criminal defense attorney involved from the
inception of the extradition proceedings.
International prisoner transfer may allow a person convicted of a crime in one
country to be transferred to his home country of citizenship to serve the remainder
of his sentence.
Interstate Extradition
Interstate extradition is the term given to the removal process of a person who
happens to have an arrest warrant issued by a foreign state for an individual
who later is picked up in another state or jurisdiction.
Generally, a suspected fugitive is arrested based on a requesting
state's warrant charging the suspect with a crime. The prosecutor
in the asylum or requested
state may then file a fugitive complaint against the suspect. If
so, the suspect is arraigned and held in custody or admitted to
bail pending issuance of a Governor's warrant. Requisition of the fugitive must be made within
90 days. The fugitive may deny the allegations in the complaint or waive formal extradition
at this time. A.R.S. §§ 13-3855, 13-3857.
Meanwhile, the prosecutor in the demanding state assembles the
appropriate extradition papers, which are submitted to the Governor
of the demanding state. If the papers
are approved as to form by the Attorney General, the Governor of
the demanding state submits his or her requisition, or formal demand,
accompanied by the supporting documents, to the Governor of the requested state.
The Governor of the requested state reviews the request and then issues a warrant of extradition
that commands the arrest and rendition of the fugitive. The fugitive is then
arraigned on the Governor's warrant and, on request, given the
opportunity to challenge its validity.
The fugitive can be admitted to bail in the state where he is seeking
asylum. A.R.S. § 13-3856.
Extradition may be challenged before the Governor's warrant is
issued at an identity hearing in the trial court. The burden of
disproving identity is on the fugitive.
However, guilt or innocence may not be inquired into except to
contest fugitive’s
identity. After the warrant is issued, extradition may be challenged by habeas
corpus. If the challenge is unsuccessful, the appropriate agency in the demanding
state is notified and sends law enforcement agents to return the fugitive to
the demanding state. If Arizona detains an inmate out of state, the inmate receives
credit for the length of detention towards the inmate’s open
Arizona charge. State v. DePasquallo, 681 P.2d 387 (Ariz. App.
1983).
All extradition cases, whether the underlying charge is a felony or misdemeanor,
are very serious and can result in immediate incarceration even though you are
innocent of any charges. Therefore, if you have been arrested on an out-of-state
arrest warrant, or if you are currently residing out-of-state resisting an Arizona
arrest warrant, you should immediately contact an experienced attorney who understands
this area of the law.
Back to Top of Page
BAIL BONDS
Whether you or a loved one is arrested for DUI or murder, a misdemeanor
or a felony, one of the first priorities is to get the accused
released from
custody. Release may be by way of a simple promise to appear, also
known as being released “OR,” or
on one’s own recognizance. However, for more serious misdemeanors
or felonies, or where the accused has a prior criminal record,
posting bond may be required to secure release.
The purpose of setting bond is two-fold: it is to ensure the presence
of the accused at future court proceedings, and it is also to safeguard
the community.
There are many factors to consider: the seriousness of the offense;
the accused’s previous criminal record, if any, whether the defendant has ties
to the community, owns property, or is employed, and many others.
Once bond has been set, it may be posted in one of several ways:
cash; government bonds or real property; or a bail bond. The bail
bondsman provides an invaluable
service. In exchange for the bondsman’s fee (usually 10%
of the amount of the bond) the bondsman will go to the police station
or jail, fill out
the necessary paperwork, and post the bond on behalf of the accused.
Bond can also be eliminated or reduced. An experienced criminal defense attorney
can be extremely helpful in getting bond reduced, or helping a defendant be released
to a responsible third party, under the supervision of the probation department,
or on his or her own recognizance.
For example, in some of our more serious felony cases, The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has been successful in seeking bond reduction in Maricopa
County Superior Court as follows:
State v. S.D. – $2.5 million
to $100,000
State v. J.O. - $500,000 to $10,000
State v. S.H. - $250,000 to $100,000
State v. R.L. - $108,000 to $32,000
Back to Top of Page
OUT-OF-STATE DEFENDANTS
Our office has represented clients from many states throughout the
country. Most cases of this nature seem to involve an individual
visiting or passing through
Arizona who has received a citation for DUI, some other misdemeanor,
or low level felony offense. As a practical matter, it can be very
expensive and inconvenient to the client to return to Arizona to attend court.
Under these circumstances, many courts will authorize our attorneys
to appear on behalf of the client. Of course, this only applies in those informal hearings
which do not necessitate the client’s personal appearance.
If the case is not dismissed and the client is required to appear, it
is usually toward the end of the case for a change of plea or sentencing.
However, courts of limited jurisdiction are authorized to accept a telephonic plea
agreement when the defendant is an out-of-state resident or resides more
than one hundred miles
from the court. Our Rules of Procedure also authorize courts to
approve a jail sentence to be served by a defendant in his or her home
state through a notarized
letter from the proper law enforcement authority certifying that
the defendant served the jail time ordered. Ariz.R.Crim.P.17.2.; Ariz.R.Crim.P.17.1.a.(3).
Back to Top of Page
WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL DEFENSE
White Collar Criminal Defense often involves representation of individuals and
companies in regulated industries in investigations by law enforcement and agency
investigators. Our representations encompass all aspects of the criminal process,
from grand jury investigations to post-indictment proceedings, including arraignment,
suppression, other pretrial motions, trial, sentencing, appeal and post-conviction
remedies. Our lawyers are experienced in-court litigators.
The firm also handles:
|
•
|
internal investigations for corporate clients;
|
|
• |
responses to agency and grand jury subpoenas; and |
|
• |
negotiation of precharge settlements. |
The
firm's representation may involve corporations in criminal proceedings,
as well as corporate directors, officers and employees, and other
individuals in private business. These cases often involve a wide range of issues such as
alleged regulatory violations,
commercial bribery, payments to public officials, fraud, perjury,
bid-rigging, and money laundering.
When our firm is retained to represent a corporate client regarding a
criminal inquiry, we may conduct our own factual investigation to develop
a strategy to convince the investigatory agency not to bring
criminal charges, or to limit the scope and severity of any charges that
are brought. Our firm can
also assist clients in complying with, and asserting
privileges and objections to, subpoenas and other investigative demands.
Back to Top of Page
PROFESSIONAL LICENSE CONSEQUENCES OF A CONVICTION
Certain types of arrests or subsequent criminal convictions can affect
a person’s ability to obtain or keep virtually every professional license
that is regulated by the
state. Some professions require that the crime be related to
the duties of the profession before the license will be affected;
others will be affected based solely upon conviction. For example:
A.R.S. § 41-1758.03 (Fingerprint Clearance Cards). Many state regulated professionals,
including, but not limited to, educators and individuals who
are employed by or contract with state or county government
to care for or provide services to children and/or the disabled
or handicapped, are required to maintain a state issued Fingerprint
Clearance Card as a condition of employment and to remain in
good standing. For certain offenses, based on an arrest alone,
the state will suspend the Fingerprint Clearance Card.
|
|
A.R.S. § 13-3414 – Requires
notice be sent to any professional licensing board or office
upon conviction for any drug offense. The judge shall send
a copy of the defendant’s conviction to any board or
office where the defendant has a license to engage in a profession
or to carry on a business. At the judge’s discretion,
the judge may suspend or revoke said license.
|
|
Under
A.R.S. § 13-904(E), a person may be denied state
employment, license, permit, or certificate to engage in an
occupation by reason of a prior felony or misdemeanor conviction
if the offense has some reasonable relationship to the duties
or functions of the employment, license, permit, or certificate. |
There
are many factors at work in the case of the professional who is accused
of crime; it is critical that the advice of a competent,
creative, and insightful
defense attorney be considered, since a conviction can have
ramifications far beyond the prosecution itself.
Back to Top of Page
SENTENCE MITIGATION
Crimes are frequently committed under “mitigating” circumstances
which do not justify or excuse the offense, but go a long way to explain the
defendant’s behavior or to provide an understanding for
why he or she may have ended up committing the particular offense.
For example, when a starving man steals bread to satisfy his hunger, this circumstance
is taken into consideration in mitigation of his sentence.
In Arizona, courts are required to take into consideration several statutorily
identified mitigating factors, including:
1.
|
The
age of the defendant.
|
|
2.
|
The
defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of the defendant’s
conduct or to conform the defendant’s conduct to the requirements
of law was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as to
constitute a defense to prosecution.
|
|
3.
|
The
defendant was under unusual or substantial duress, although not
such as to constitute a defense to prosecution.
|
|
4.
|
The
degree of the defendant’s participation in the crime was
minor, although not so minor as to constitute a defense to prosecution.
|
|
5.
|
Any
other factor that the court deems appropriate to the ends of
justice.
|
Additionally,
Arizona courts have recognized numerous nonstatutory mitigating factors
including:
•
|
Remorse – State v. Spears, 184 Ariz. 277 293, 904 P.2d 1062 cert. denied
519 U.S. 567 (1996).
|
|
•
|
Love
of family/concern for parents – Id.
|
|
•
|
Lack
of criminal history - Id. at 293; State v. Doerr, 193 Ariz. 56,
70, 969 P.2d 1168, 1182 (Ariz. 1998)
|
|
•
|
Employment
history – Id. at 294.
|
|
•
|
Low
intelligence – State v. Kayer, 194 Ariz. 423, 434, 984
P.2d 31 (Ariz. 1999).
|
|
•
|
Prior
military service – Id.
|
|
•
|
Disparity
between sentences – as between co-defendants – Id.;
State v. Carlson, 202 Ariz. 570, 586, 48 P.3d 1180 (Ariz. 2002).
|
|
•
|
Aberrant
behavior - U.S. V. Colace, 126 F. 3d 1229 (9th Cir. 1997).
|
|
•
|
Prior
sexual or emotional abuse - State v. Miller, 186 Ariz. 314, 326,
921 P.2d 1151 (Ariz. 1996).
|
An
experienced defense attorney will attempt to persuade the prosecuting
attorney and court through the presentation of evidence of mitigating
circumstances that a lenient sentence is appropriate based
upon the defendant’s unique background and circumstances. The most persuasive
manner in obtaining this objective is
to present a thorough, thoughtful, and competent mitigation
packet to the prosecuting attorney and court.
In those cases where the preliminary review of the evidence suggests
the defendant may ultimately be convicted, the attorney should immediately
start thinking about collecting mitigation evidence. Many defense attorneys
minimize the importance of mitigation evidence early in their representation.
However, in many cases there is nothing more important. Because the collection
of mitigation evidence, through interviews and record searches, is both
time consuming and often requires special knowledge and expertise, attorneys often retain
an experienced mitigation specialist to join the defense team.
A mitigation specialist is an expert qualified by knowledge, skill, experience,
and training as a criminal justice, mental health or sociology
professional. Their experience is to investigate, evaluate, and present
factual, psychological and other mitigating
circumstances to persuade the court that for this particular
defendant, a certain sentence may be unduly harsh and, thus, inappropriate.
Mitigation evidence necessary for a proper and thorough
mitigation packet (or penalty presentation) can be voluminous.
The mitigation evidence is in effect a collection of the defendant’s and his or her family’s life history.
This evidence should consist of information, documentation, and public records
pertaining to relevant aspects of the defendant’s
social, educational, medical, and mental health background.
Examples of the records that are often sought may include the following:
|
•
|
Birth
records
|
•
|
Marriage/divorce records |
• |
Military records |
|
•
|
Medical
records
|
• |
Death certificates |
• |
Social services |
|
•
|
Mental
health records
|
•
|
Juvenile court records |
• |
Criminal records |
| •
|
School
records
|
•
|
Employment records |
• |
Counseling records |
Back
to Top of Page
ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING
Even if the accused has been caught with his or her “hand in the cookie
jar,” and a criminal conviction seems a certainty,
in many cases there are creative alternatives to the
prosecution itself or a sentence of jail
or prison. Many prosecutorial agencies and courts offer
diversion programs which can be completed as an alternative to the prosecution.
Alternatives to jail may include alcohol and drug treatment
or rehabilitation, probation, electronic monitoring
and house arrest, work release, work furlough, community service,
and many more. There are pros and cons to each, and a
knowledgeable defense attorney can help
determine which options are available and best for you.
WORK FURLOUGH
The work furlough program, under the supervision of the
Maricopa County Adult Probation Office, allows people
who have been sentenced to serve a jail term
to get out for work. To participate in the work furlough
program, the defendant must be screened by a probation
officer before sentencing and meet many
eligibility requirements. For example, the defendant
must be statutorily eligible to
serve jail rather than prison time; the defendant must
be at least 18 years of age;
the plea agreement cannot preclude work furlough; if
the defendant is self-employed, documentation must be provided
showing the business is legitimate; and many more. In addition, prior to sentencing the defendant
must obtain a doctor’s
certification that he or she is physically fit to live
in the tents. Finally, the work furlough
program is not free. To the contrary, a daily fee is
calculated on a sliding scale and each work furlough
participant must have their paychecks forwarded
directly to the clerk of the court for automatic deduction
of these fees.
Back to Top of Page
WORK RELEASE
The work release program allows people who have been sentenced to serve a jail
term to get out for work. But, work release is vastly different from the work
furlough program. The work release program is not supervised by the Maricopa
County Adult Probation Office. Instead, the judge sets the days and times of
release. There are no fees involved with work release. This program is typically
available to people ordered to serve jail terms for misdemeanor convictions.
Whether participating in work furlough or work release, the defendant is not
allowed out more than 12 hours per day nor more than six days per week. In fact,
defendants in DUI cases are only allowed out for a maximum of five days per week.
MISDEMEANOR COMPROMISE
In Arizona, a defendant accused of a misdemeanor or petty
offense, who injures someone by the act constituting
the offense, may be able to compromise the charge. This requires the injured party to appear before
the court prior to trial, and
acknowledge that he or she has received satisfaction
for the injury. The court may then order the prosecution
dismissed.
A.R.S. § 13-3981.
Typically, offenses: (1) committed by or upon any officer
of justice while in the execution of the duties of his
office; (2) committed riotously; (3) committed
with intent to commit a felony, and (4) involving an
act of assault, threatening
or intimidating or a misdemeanor offense of domestic
violence as defined in section 13-3601, cannot be compromised.
A.R.S. § 13-3981.
Back to Top of Page
PROBATION REVOCATIONS
In probation revocation proceedings, the probation department petitions the court
to revoke the probation of the defendant. The petition sets forth the particulars
of the alleged violations.
If the defendant has been arrested, he will be held without bond pending a hearing
on the petition. At the hearing, the state has the burden of proving by a preponderance
of the evidence that the defendant violated the conditions of probation. The
defendant has the right to counsel, the right against self-incrimination, the
right to a public hearing, the right to call witnesses and to issue compulsory
process to compel their attendance, the right to confront and examine witnesses
called by the state, and the right to present evidence on his own behalf. However,
the defendant does not have a right to a jury trial. If the defendant is found
to have violated the conditions of probation, the court may reinstate the defendant
on probation with the same or additional terms. Alternatively, the court can
terminate probation and remand the defendant to state prison, taking into account
the best interests of the defendant and the public. Ariz.R.Crim.P.27.7(b)(3).
However, if the probationer violates “intensive probation” with a
new felony offense, reinstatement may not be available. A.R.S. § 13-917(B).
Back to Top of Page
APPEALS AND WRITS
Section 24 of the Arizona Constitution guarantees the
defendant in a criminal prosecution the right to appeal
his or her conviction. The purpose of an
appeal is to ensure that the trial court did not make
any legal errors
throughout the trial process. Appeals may result in the
reversal of a person’s
trial court conviction. In the case of an appeal from
a municipal or justice court, the defendant
must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial
court within 10 days after the entry of judgment and
sentence. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 30.2. In the case
of an appeal from Superior Court, the defendant must
file a notice of appeal
with the clerk of the court within 20 days after the
entry of judgment and sentence. Ariz. R. Crim. P.
31.3.
Criminal appeals and specialized legal writs are active
areas of practice for our firm. Following a conviction,
appellate lawyers review the trial transcript
or the “record” to determine if one or more
legal errors may have occurred. If so, the conviction
can be attacked in the Appellate Court and possibly overturned.
A successful appeal can also result in the suppression
of evidence, a reduction in sentence, or the granting
of a new trial. Because appeals are based on
the "record" in the case as it occurred in the trial court, no new evidence
is usually presented with the briefs submitted to the
Appellate Court. Appeals are almost always time consuming and drawn out,
but can reap great rewards for those erroneously convicted.
Under Arizona law, the court shall not release a defendant
on bond pending appeal following conviction and incarceration
for a felony offense for which he has received a sentence
of imprisonment except when the court is satisfied the
person in custody is in such physical condition that
continued confinement would endanger his life.
A.R.S. § 13-3961.01.
Back to Top of Page
RULE 32 POST-CONVICTION REMEDIES
Following conviction, a Rule 32 Petition for Post-Conviction
Relief (“PCR”) may be filed in an attempt to overturn the conviction
to win early release or dismissal of the case. A PCR
notice must be filed within ninety days after the
entry of judgment and sentence or within thirty days
after the issuance of the final order or mandate by the
appellate court. Ariz.R.Crim.P.32.4
Grounds to file a petition pursuant to Rule 32.1 include the following:
|
1.
|
The
conviction or sentence is in violation of the Constitution of
the United States or the State of Arizona.
|
|
2.
|
The
court was without jurisdiction to render judgment or impose sentence.
|
|
3.
|
The
sentence imposed exceeds the maximum allowed by law.
|
|
4.
|
The
person is held in custody after the sentence expired.
|
|
5.
|
Newly
discovered material facts probably exist and such facts probably
would have changed the verdict or sentence.
|
|
6.
|
The
defendant failed to appeal and it was not the fault of the defendant.
|
|
7.
|
There
has been a significant change of law that if determined to supply
to defendant’s case would probably overturn the defendant’s
conviction or sentence.
|
PCR proceedings are precluded when: (1) the issue should have been raised on
appeal; (2) the issue was already decided in an appeal or collateral proceeding;
and (3) when the issue has been waived. Ariz.R.Crim.P.32.2.
Back to Top of Page
RESTORATION OF RIGHTS / SETTING ASIDE CONVICTIONS
A criminal record can hold a person back personally and professionally. Convicted
felons often have difficulty obtaining good jobs, getting into schools, or just
moving on in life, and feeling like they have closed the door on a chapter of
the past. Once a person pays their debt to society through fines, jail time,
or successfully completing probation, it is time to clean up their criminal record.
Automatic
Restoration of Rights – A.R.S. § 13-912 – First-time
felony offender’s civil rights, with the exception of the
right to possess firearms, are automatically restored upon payment
of all fines and restitution.
|
|
Restoration
of Rights – A.R.S. § 13-905 - Generally a person
whose period of probation has been completed may have his civil
rights restored by a judge upon proper application. There may
be further restrictions on the right to possess or carry a
gun or firearm. The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C.
can petition the court to restore your civil rights so that
you can again vote and carry a gun.
|
|
Setting
Aside Convictions – A.R.S. § 13-907 - This statute
allows a court to set aside a judgment of a convicted person
on discharge. Every person convicted of a criminal offense may,
upon fulfillment of the conditions of probation or sentence and
discharge by the court, apply to the judge, justice of the peace
or magistrate who pronounced sentence or imposed probation or
such judge's successor, to have the judgment set aside. Application
must be made in writing by an attorney, probation officer or
the defendant. If the judge grants the application, the court
shall set aside the judgment of guilt, dismiss the accusations,
except for penalties imposed by §§ 28-3304, 28-3306,
28-3307, and 28-3308.
|
The
following criminal offenses may not be set aside:
|
1.
|
Involving
serious physical injury;
|
|
2.
|
Involving
use or exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument;
|
|
3.
|
Sexual
offense;
|
|
4.
|
If
the victim is a minor under age 15;
|
|
5.
|
A
violation of § 28-3473, any local ordinance related to operation
of a vehicle
|
Note: A conviction for DUI and certain other criminal traffic offenses under
state law can be set aside because they are not violations
of “local ordinances” pertaining to the operation of a vehicle.
Back to Top of
Page
The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. is a leading Phoenix, Arizona DUI
and criminal defense law firm dedicated to the aggressive
representation of clients involving all aspects of
vehicular crimes and criminal litigation. We handle cases
in Federal, State, Municipal, Juvenile, and Appellate
Courts throughout the greater Phoenix Metropolitan Area
and all of Arizona.
|
 |