CRIMINAL CASES IN ARIZONA


If you have been arrested or accused of a crime or serious traffic offense, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney who is able to honestly answer your questions and zealously protect your individual and constitutional rights. The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has significant experience and expertise in successfully defending clients in criminal cases in state and federal courts throughout Arizona.

Any person facing the possibility of being convicted of a crime, being sent to jail or prison, or being placed on probation, should always hire an experienced criminal defense attorney. The complexity of the criminal justice system, coupled with the emotional, social, and professional impact of a conviction requires professional representation. Each criminal case is unique, and only an attorney who is experienced in dealing with the many variables present in any given prosecution, can provide meaningful representation for those charged with a criminal offense. This is so even in the cases where a conviction seems a certainty. Often, there are creative alternatives to the prosecution itself and in sentencing.

We represent clients in all types of criminal and traffic cases, from minor infractions and misdemeanors, to the most serious felonies. Our criminal practice includes legal advice and representation in the following areas:

 General Offenses    DUI/Traffic
 Aggravated Assault    Aggravated Driving
 Arson    Aggravated DUI
 Assault    Drag Racing
 Bribery    Driving on a Suspended License
 Burglary    Endangerment
 Child Abuse or Neglect    Extreme DUI
 Criminal Trespass    Misdemeanor DUI and DWI
 Criminal Damage    Motor Vehicle Hearings
 Domestic Violence    Reckless Driving
 Embezzlement    
 False Statements    Sex Offenses
 Forgery    Computer Crimes
 Injunction Against Harassment Violations    Failure to Register as a Sex Offender
 Issuing Bad Checks    Molestation of a Child
 Kidnapping    Public Sexual Indecency
 Manslaughter    Sex Abuse
 Misconduct with Weapons    Sex Assault
 Murder    Sexual Misconduct with a Minor
 Negligent Homicide    
 Order of Protection Violations    White Collar Crimes
 Pandering    Environmental Crimes
 Perjury    Extortion
 Resisting Arrest    Fraudulent Schemes
 Robbery    Money Laundering
 Shoplifting    Professional Licensing Issues
 Stalking    Racketeering
 Theft    Regulatory Crimes
 Unlawful Imprisonment    
     Post-Conviction Remedies
 Miscellaneous    Appeals
 Custodial Interference    Rule 32 Post Conviction Remedies
 Extradition Cases    Setting Aside Convictions
 Forfeiture Cases    Restoration of Rights
 Juvenile Court Cases    Restitution Cases
 Probation Violations    Motion for New Trial

Please note this list is not exhaustive. Regardless of the charge, we can assure you that your driving privileges, your liberty, and your welfare are best placed with us when legal problems present themselves. If you have been charged with any type of criminal or traffic offense, you need quality representation. The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has successfully defended through settlement, bench, and jury trials well over one thousand such cases. We help our clients successfully negotiate the criminal justice system and provide outstanding representation in all aspects of criminal law.

An experienced and knowledgeable criminal defense attorney can:



negotiate plea "deals" with prosecutors, often arranging for dismissal, diversions, reduced charges, and lesser sentencing;

  help clients cope with their emotions and feelings of embarrassment, uncertainty, anxiety, and fear that a criminal investigation or charges tend to produce in many individuals;
  provide clients with an objective perspective on their situation and what is likely to happen should their case proceed to trial. This perspective is vital for defendants trying to decide whether or not to accept a prosecutor's offered "plea agreement;"
  apply the applicable law, legal precedent, and rules that people representing themselves or inexperienced attorneys may find difficult to locate on their own. Many criminal law precedents are set forth in court interpretations of federal and state constitutions. For example, understanding and challenging what may constitute “reasonable suspicion” to stop a vehicle or "probable cause for arrest” requires familiarity with particular legal issues as set forth in state and federal appellate court opinions, statutory law, and rules of procedure;
  help you navigate the judicial system through years of practical experience. A seasoned criminal practitioner will be familiar with local court customs and procedures that are not written down anywhere. For example, a knowledgeable and experienced defense attorney may know which prosecutor or supervisor has the authority to help settle a case; what kinds of arguments are likely to appeal to a particular prosecutor, and what a certain judge may be inclined to do based upon past experience;
understand the possible "hidden costs" of pleading guilty;
gather information from prosecution witnesses, who often fear people accused of crimes and are, therefore, reluctant to speak to people representing themselves;
hire and manage investigators, expert witnesses, psychologists and other "defense team" members; and
formulate sentencing programs tailored to a client's particular needs, often helping defendants address a specific problem and/or avoid a prison or jail sentence;


BENCH WARRANTS

When a defendant fails to appear for a scheduled court date, the judge will order a bench warrant for the defendant's arrest. The warrant is a court order authorizing a person's arrest. If a defendant is apprehended outside of Arizona on an outstanding Arizona felony warrant, Arizona may seek the defendant's extradition back to Arizona. The decision to extradite depends in large part on the nature of the charges. If a defendant is apprehended in Arizona on an outstanding Arizona warrant, the defendant is not usually eligible for release until the defendant is taken before the court that issued the warrant.

When a bench warrant is issued and the defendant has an insufficient explanation for failing to appear, there can be serious consequences. These may include the defendant being further prosecuted for failing to appear as required by law, the court granting default judgment(s) against the defendant on civil traffic tickets, the defendant being held in civil contempt of court, the defendant's driver's license being suspended, and the defendant's bond being forfeited. Failing to appear on a felony charge can be charged as a separate felony offense. Failing to appear on a misdemeanor can be charged as a separate misdemeanor offense.

A criminal defense attorney can assist an out-of-custody defendant who has an outstanding bench warrant by:

1. having the defendant prepare to post-adequate bond;
2. asking the state to agree to reasonable conditions of release;
3. filing a motion requesting the court quash the warrant;
4. arranging a date where the defendant can self-surrender before the judge that issued the bench warrant; and
5. appearing in court with the defendant to assist the court in setting conditions of release.

Back to Top of Page


EXTRADITION

International

Extradition refers to the formal process by which an individual is delivered from the country where he is located to the requesting or demanding country in order to face prosecution, or if already convicted, to serve a sentence.

Extradition is usually carried out pursuant to a treaty between two countries (bilateral treaty) or between multiple countries (multilateral convention). The United States currently has extradition treaties in force with over 100 countries.

Extradition to the demanding country is subject to the laws, procedures and policies of the asylum or requested country (the country the defendant is to be delivered from). If the individual is extradited to the requesting country, the manner in which he is prosecuted or sentenced in the requesting country may be positively influenced by having a competent criminal defense attorney involved from the inception of the extradition proceedings.

International prisoner transfer may allow a person convicted of a crime in one country to be transferred to his home country of citizenship to serve the remainder of his sentence.

Interstate Extradition

Interstate extradition is the term given to the removal process of a person who happens to have an arrest warrant issued by a foreign state for an individual who later is picked up in another state or jurisdiction.

Generally, a suspected fugitive is arrested based on a requesting state's warrant charging the suspect with a crime. The prosecutor in the asylum or requested state may then file a fugitive complaint against the suspect. If so, the suspect is arraigned and held in custody or admitted to bail pending issuance of a Governor's warrant. Requisition of the fugitive must be made within 90 days. The fugitive may deny the allegations in the complaint or waive formal extradition at this time. A.R.S. §§ 13-3855, 13-3857.

Meanwhile, the prosecutor in the demanding state assembles the appropriate extradition papers, which are submitted to the Governor of the demanding state. If the papers are approved as to form by the Attorney General, the Governor of the demanding state submits his or her requisition, or formal demand, accompanied by the supporting documents, to the Governor of the requested state. The Governor of the requested state reviews the request and then issues a warrant of extradition that commands the arrest and rendition of the fugitive. The fugitive is then arraigned on the Governor's warrant and, on request, given the opportunity to challenge its validity. The fugitive can be admitted to bail in the state where he is seeking asylum. A.R.S. § 13-3856.

Extradition may be challenged before the Governor's warrant is issued at an identity hearing in the trial court. The burden of disproving identity is on the fugitive. However, guilt or innocence may not be inquired into except to contest fugitive’s identity. After the warrant is issued, extradition may be challenged by habeas corpus. If the challenge is unsuccessful, the appropriate agency in the demanding state is notified and sends law enforcement agents to return the fugitive to the demanding state. If Arizona detains an inmate out of state, the inmate receives credit for the length of detention towards the inmate’s open Arizona charge. State v. DePasquallo, 681 P.2d 387 (Ariz. App. 1983).

All extradition cases, whether the underlying charge is a felony or misdemeanor, are very serious and can result in immediate incarceration even though you are innocent of any charges. Therefore, if you have been arrested on an out-of-state arrest warrant, or if you are currently residing out-of-state resisting an Arizona arrest warrant, you should immediately contact an experienced attorney who understands this area of the law.


Back to Top of Page


BAIL BONDS

Whether you or a loved one is arrested for DUI or murder, a misdemeanor or a felony, one of the first priorities is to get the accused released from custody. Release may be by way of a simple promise to appear, also known as being released “OR,” or on one’s own recognizance. However, for more serious misdemeanors or felonies, or where the accused has a prior criminal record, posting bond may be required to secure release.

The purpose of setting bond is two-fold: it is to ensure the presence of the accused at future court proceedings, and it is also to safeguard the community. There are many factors to consider: the seriousness of the offense; the accused’s previous criminal record, if any, whether the defendant has ties to the community, owns property, or is employed, and many others.

Once bond has been set, it may be posted in one of several ways: cash; government bonds or real property; or a bail bond. The bail bondsman provides an invaluable service. In exchange for the bondsman’s fee (usually 10% of the amount of the bond) the bondsman will go to the police station or jail, fill out the necessary paperwork, and post the bond on behalf of the accused.

Bond can also be eliminated or reduced. An experienced criminal defense attorney can be extremely helpful in getting bond reduced, or helping a defendant be released to a responsible third party, under the supervision of the probation department, or on his or her own recognizance.
For example, in some of our more serious felony cases, The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. has been successful in seeking bond reduction in Maricopa County Superior Court as follows:

    State v. S.D. – $2.5 million to $100,000
    State v. J.O. - $500,000 to $10,000
    State v. S.H. - $250,000 to $100,000
    State v. R.L. - $108,000 to $32,000


Back to Top of Page


OUT-OF-STATE DEFENDANTS

Our office has represented clients from many states throughout the country. Most cases of this nature seem to involve an individual visiting or passing through Arizona who has received a citation for DUI, some other misdemeanor, or low level felony offense. As a practical matter, it can be very expensive and inconvenient to the client to return to Arizona to attend court. Under these circumstances, many courts will authorize our attorneys to appear on behalf of the client. Of course, this only applies in those informal hearings which do not necessitate the client’s personal appearance.

If the case is not dismissed and the client is required to appear, it is usually toward the end of the case for a change of plea or sentencing. However, courts of limited jurisdiction are authorized to accept a telephonic plea agreement when the defendant is an out-of-state resident or resides more than one hundred miles from the court. Our Rules of Procedure also authorize courts to approve a jail sentence to be served by a defendant in his or her home state through a notarized letter from the proper law enforcement authority certifying that the defendant served the jail time ordered. Ariz.R.Crim.P.17.2.; Ariz.R.Crim.P.17.1.a.(3).

Back to Top of Page


WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL DEFENSE

White Collar Criminal Defense often involves representation of individuals and companies in regulated industries in investigations by law enforcement and agency investigators. Our representations encompass all aspects of the criminal process, from grand jury investigations to post-indictment proceedings, including arraignment, suppression, other pretrial motions, trial, sentencing, appeal and post-conviction remedies. Our lawyers are experienced in-court litigators.

The firm also handles:


internal investigations for corporate clients;

  responses to agency and grand jury subpoenas; and
  negotiation of precharge settlements.

The firm's representation may involve corporations in criminal proceedings, as well as corporate directors, officers and employees, and other individuals in private business. These cases often involve a wide range of issues such as alleged regulatory violations, commercial bribery, payments to public officials, fraud, perjury, bid-rigging, and money laundering.

When our firm is retained to represent a corporate client regarding a criminal inquiry, we may conduct our own factual investigation to develop a strategy to convince the investigatory agency not to bring criminal charges, or to limit the scope and severity of any charges that are brought. Our firm can also assist clients in complying with, and asserting privileges and objections to, subpoenas and other investigative demands.


Back to Top of Page


PROFESSIONAL LICENSE CONSEQUENCES OF A CONVICTION

Certain types of arrests or subsequent criminal convictions can affect a person’s ability to obtain or keep virtually every professional license that is regulated by the state. Some professions require that the crime be related to the duties of the profession before the license will be affected; others will be affected based solely upon conviction. For example:

A.R.S. § 41-1758.03 (Fingerprint Clearance Cards). Many state regulated professionals, including, but not limited to, educators and individuals who are employed by or contract with state or county government to care for or provide services to children and/or the disabled or handicapped, are required to maintain a state issued Fingerprint Clearance Card as a condition of employment and to remain in good standing. For certain offenses, based on an arrest alone, the state will suspend the Fingerprint Clearance Card.
 

A.R.S. § 13-3414 – Requires notice be sent to any professional licensing board or office upon conviction for any drug offense. The judge shall send a copy of the defendant’s conviction to any board or office where the defendant has a license to engage in a profession or to carry on a business. At the judge’s discretion, the judge may suspend or revoke said license.
 

Under A.R.S. § 13-904(E), a person may be denied state employment, license, permit, or certificate to engage in an occupation by reason of a prior felony or misdemeanor conviction if the offense has some reasonable relationship to the duties or functions of the employment, license, permit, or certificate.

There are many factors at work in the case of the professional who is accused of crime; it is critical that the advice of a competent, creative, and insightful defense attorney be considered, since a conviction can have ramifications far beyond the prosecution itself.

Back to Top of Page


SENTENCE MITIGATION

Crimes are frequently committed under “mitigating” circumstances which do not justify or excuse the offense, but go a long way to explain the defendant’s behavior or to provide an understanding for why he or she may have ended up committing the particular offense. For example, when a starving man steals bread to satisfy his hunger, this circumstance is taken into consideration in mitigation of his sentence.

In Arizona, courts are required to take into consideration several statutorily identified mitigating factors, including:

1.
The age of the defendant.
2. The defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of the defendant’s conduct or to conform the defendant’s conduct to the requirements of law was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as to constitute a defense to prosecution.
3. The defendant was under unusual or substantial duress, although not such as to constitute a defense to prosecution.
4. The degree of the defendant’s participation in the crime was minor, although not so minor as to constitute a defense to prosecution.
5. Any other factor that the court deems appropriate to the ends of justice.

Additionally, Arizona courts have recognized numerous nonstatutory mitigating factors including:


RemorseState v. Spears, 184 Ariz. 277 293, 904 P.2d 1062 cert. denied 519 U.S. 567 (1996).
Love of family/concern for parentsId.
Lack of criminal history - Id. at 293; State v. Doerr, 193 Ariz. 56, 70, 969 P.2d 1168, 1182 (Ariz. 1998)
Employment historyId. at 294.
Low intelligenceState v. Kayer, 194 Ariz. 423, 434, 984 P.2d 31 (Ariz. 1999).
Prior military serviceId.
Disparity between sentences – as between co-defendantsId.; State v. Carlson, 202 Ariz. 570, 586, 48 P.3d 1180 (Ariz. 2002).
Aberrant behavior - U.S. V. Colace, 126 F. 3d 1229 (9th Cir. 1997).
Prior sexual or emotional abuse - State v. Miller, 186 Ariz. 314, 326, 921 P.2d 1151 (Ariz. 1996).

An experienced defense attorney will attempt to persuade the prosecuting attorney and court through the presentation of evidence of mitigating circumstances that a lenient sentence is appropriate based upon the defendant’s unique background and circumstances. The most persuasive manner in obtaining this objective is to present a thorough, thoughtful, and competent mitigation packet to the prosecuting attorney and court.

In those cases where the preliminary review of the evidence suggests the defendant may ultimately be convicted, the attorney should immediately start thinking about collecting mitigation evidence. Many defense attorneys minimize the importance of mitigation evidence early in their representation. However, in many cases there is nothing more important. Because the collection of mitigation evidence, through interviews and record searches, is both time consuming and often requires special knowledge and expertise, attorneys often retain an experienced mitigation specialist to join the defense team.

A mitigation specialist is an expert qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, and training as a criminal justice, mental health or sociology professional. Their experience is to investigate, evaluate, and present factual, psychological and other mitigating circumstances to persuade the court that for this particular defendant, a certain sentence may be unduly harsh and, thus, inappropriate.

Mitigation evidence necessary for a proper and thorough mitigation packet (or penalty presentation) can be voluminous. The mitigation evidence is in effect a collection of the defendant’s and his or her family’s life history. This evidence should consist of information, documentation, and public records pertaining to relevant aspects of the defendant’s social, educational, medical, and mental health background.

Examples of the records that are often sought may include the following:

Birth records Marriage/divorce records Military records
Medical records Death certificates Social services
Mental health records Juvenile court records Criminal records
School records Employment records Counseling records

Back to Top of Page


ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING

Even if the accused has been caught with his or her “hand in the cookie jar,” and a criminal conviction seems a certainty, in many cases there are creative alternatives to the prosecution itself or a sentence of jail or prison. Many prosecutorial agencies and courts offer diversion programs which can be completed as an alternative to the prosecution. Alternatives to jail may include alcohol and drug treatment or rehabilitation, probation, electronic monitoring and house arrest, work release, work furlough, community service, and many more. There are pros and cons to each, and a knowledgeable defense attorney can help determine which options are available and best for you.


WORK FURLOUGH

The work furlough program, under the supervision of the Maricopa County Adult Probation Office, allows people who have been sentenced to serve a jail term to get out for work. To participate in the work furlough program, the defendant must be screened by a probation officer before sentencing and meet many eligibility requirements. For example, the defendant must be statutorily eligible to serve jail rather than prison time; the defendant must be at least 18 years of age; the plea agreement cannot preclude work furlough; if the defendant is self-employed, documentation must be provided showing the business is legitimate; and many more. In addition, prior to sentencing the defendant must obtain a doctor’s certification that he or she is physically fit to live in the tents. Finally, the work furlough program is not free. To the contrary, a daily fee is calculated on a sliding scale and each work furlough participant must have their paychecks forwarded directly to the clerk of the court for automatic deduction of these fees.

Back to Top of Page


WORK RELEASE

The work release program allows people who have been sentenced to serve a jail term to get out for work. But, work release is vastly different from the work furlough program. The work release program is not supervised by the Maricopa County Adult Probation Office. Instead, the judge sets the days and times of release. There are no fees involved with work release. This program is typically available to people ordered to serve jail terms for misdemeanor convictions.

Whether participating in work furlough or work release, the defendant is not allowed out more than 12 hours per day nor more than six days per week. In fact, defendants in DUI cases are only allowed out for a maximum of five days per week.



MISDEMEANOR COMPROMISE

In Arizona, a defendant accused of a misdemeanor or petty offense, who injures someone by the act constituting the offense, may be able to compromise the charge. This requires the injured party to appear before the court prior to trial, and acknowledge that he or she has received satisfaction for the injury. The court may then order the prosecution dismissed. A.R.S. § 13-3981.

Typically, offenses: (1) committed by or upon any officer of justice while in the execution of the duties of his office; (2) committed riotously; (3) committed with intent to commit a felony, and (4) involving an act of assault, threatening or intimidating or a misdemeanor offense of domestic violence as defined in section 13-3601, cannot be compromised. A.R.S. § 13-3981.


Back to Top of Page


PROBATION REVOCATIONS

In probation revocation proceedings, the probation department petitions the court to revoke the probation of the defendant. The petition sets forth the particulars of the alleged violations.
If the defendant has been arrested, he will be held without bond pending a hearing on the petition. At the hearing, the state has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated the conditions of probation. The defendant has the right to counsel, the right against self-incrimination, the right to a public hearing, the right to call witnesses and to issue compulsory process to compel their attendance, the right to confront and examine witnesses called by the state, and the right to present evidence on his own behalf. However, the defendant does not have a right to a jury trial. If the defendant is found to have violated the conditions of probation, the court may reinstate the defendant on probation with the same or additional terms. Alternatively, the court can terminate probation and remand the defendant to state prison, taking into account the best interests of the defendant and the public. Ariz.R.Crim.P.27.7(b)(3).

However, if the probationer violates “intensive probation” with a new felony offense, reinstatement may not be available. A.R.S. § 13-917(B).

Back to Top of Page


APPEALS AND WRITS

Section 24 of the Arizona Constitution guarantees the defendant in a criminal prosecution the right to appeal his or her conviction. The purpose of an appeal is to ensure that the trial court did not make any legal errors throughout the trial process. Appeals may result in the reversal of a person’s trial court conviction. In the case of an appeal from a municipal or justice court, the defendant must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within 10 days after the entry of judgment and sentence. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 30.2. In the case of an appeal from Superior Court, the defendant must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the court within 20 days after the entry of judgment and sentence. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.3.

Criminal appeals and specialized legal writs are active areas of practice for our firm. Following a conviction, appellate lawyers review the trial transcript or the “record” to determine if one or more legal errors may have occurred. If so, the conviction can be attacked in the Appellate Court and possibly overturned.

A successful appeal can also result in the suppression of evidence, a reduction in sentence, or the granting of a new trial. Because appeals are based on the "record" in the case as it occurred in the trial court, no new evidence is usually presented with the briefs submitted to the Appellate Court. Appeals are almost always time consuming and drawn out, but can reap great rewards for those erroneously convicted.

Under Arizona law, the court shall not release a defendant on bond pending appeal following conviction and incarceration for a felony offense for which he has received a sentence of imprisonment except when the court is satisfied the person in custody is in such physical condition that continued confinement would endanger his life. A.R.S. § 13-3961.01.

Back to Top of Page


RULE 32 POST-CONVICTION REMEDIES

Following conviction, a Rule 32 Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (“PCR”) may be filed in an attempt to overturn the conviction to win early release or dismissal of the case. A PCR notice must be filed within ninety days after the entry of judgment and sentence or within thirty days after the issuance of the final order or mandate by the appellate court. Ariz.R.Crim.P.32.4

Grounds to file a petition pursuant to Rule 32.1 include the following:

1. The conviction or sentence is in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the State of Arizona.
2. The court was without jurisdiction to render judgment or impose sentence.
3. The sentence imposed exceeds the maximum allowed by law.
4. The person is held in custody after the sentence expired.
5. Newly discovered material facts probably exist and such facts probably would have changed the verdict or sentence.
6. The defendant failed to appeal and it was not the fault of the defendant.
7. There has been a significant change of law that if determined to supply to defendant’s case would probably overturn the defendant’s conviction or sentence.


PCR proceedings are precluded when: (1) the issue should have been raised on appeal; (2) the issue was already decided in an appeal or collateral proceeding; and (3) when the issue has been waived. Ariz.R.Crim.P.32.2.

Back to Top of Page


RESTORATION OF RIGHTS / SETTING ASIDE CONVICTIONS

A criminal record can hold a person back personally and professionally. Convicted felons often have difficulty obtaining good jobs, getting into schools, or just moving on in life, and feeling like they have closed the door on a chapter of the past. Once a person pays their debt to society through fines, jail time, or successfully completing probation, it is time to clean up their criminal record.

Automatic Restoration of Rights – A.R.S. § 13-912 – First-time felony offender’s civil rights, with the exception of the right to possess firearms, are automatically restored upon payment of all fines and restitution.
 

Restoration of Rights – A.R.S. § 13-905 - Generally a person whose period of probation has been completed may have his civil rights restored by a judge upon proper application. There may be further restrictions on the right to possess or carry a gun or firearm. The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. can petition the court to restore your civil rights so that you can again vote and carry a gun.
 

Setting Aside Convictions – A.R.S. § 13-907 - This statute allows a court to set aside a judgment of a convicted person on discharge. Every person convicted of a criminal offense may, upon fulfillment of the conditions of probation or sentence and discharge by the court, apply to the judge, justice of the peace or magistrate who pronounced sentence or imposed probation or such judge's successor, to have the judgment set aside. Application must be made in writing by an attorney, probation officer or the defendant. If the judge grants the application, the court shall set aside the judgment of guilt, dismiss the accusations, except for penalties imposed by §§ 28-3304, 28-3306, 28-3307, and 28-3308.

The following criminal offenses may not be set aside:

1. Involving serious physical injury;
2. Involving use or exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument;
3. Sexual offense;
4. If the victim is a minor under age 15;
5. A violation of § 28-3473, any local ordinance related to operation of a vehicle

Note: A conviction for DUI and certain other criminal traffic offenses under state law can be set aside because they are not violations of “local ordinances” pertaining to the operation of a vehicle.

Back to Top of Page



The Gillespie Law Firm, P.C. is a leading Phoenix, Arizona DUI and criminal defense law firm dedicated to the aggressive representation of clients involving all aspects of vehicular crimes and criminal litigation. We handle cases in Federal, State, Municipal, Juvenile, and Appellate Courts throughout the greater Phoenix Metropolitan Area and all of Arizona.

 
© Copyright 2003-2009, Craig C. Gillespie, All Rights Reserved Worldwide major credit cards accepted
Web Site Design by: Mike Rebel Design

 
Site Map  ::  Map and Directions  ::  Arizona Criminal Attorney  ::  Arizona DUI Attorney  ::  Legal Disclaimer  ::  Privacy Policy